Inconceivable as it may sound, there are bloggers out there who have stated that they do not intend to be present at the BGCT meeting in Houston and that they hope others will join them in absenting themselves from the sessions.
I know I am just a grunt out here, but I don’t understand that reasoning. Why would anyone wish for the demise of the BGCT? Why would anyone wish no one would attend the sessions?
Now, I understand disillusionment. I understand that individuals may wish to absent themselves from the convention meeting. I understand that meeting in Houston makes attending from El Paso, Lubbock or Amarillo a bit dicey. I understand that some from far regions may find it too difficult to attend.
I do not understand, though, anyone hoping that no one attends and that the BGCT would, as a result, suffer embarrassment or apathy from its churches. That seems a bit mean-spirited to me. Also, weakening the BGCT only hinders the cooperating churches from benefitting from the convention’s ministries to those same churches.
A lot has happened at the BGCT since I retired that I disagree with and a lot has happened that made me downright angry. However, one thing I know is that the BGCT is not the people who did things that made me angry or did things with which I disagreed. The BGCT is not the Executive Director nor the staff. The BGCT is the churches. If the churches fail to elect messengers to attend the convention, and if messengers fail to make their wishes known, then they forfeit the right to stand on the sidelines and criticize the decisions of the convention.
I have heard people say they will never attend another convention and then harangue decisions made by those who do attend. Motions will be presented almost every year that many of us find disagreeable. That will be the case this year. Some have stated they intend to make motions at this year’s convention to change the fundamental manner in which we elect volunteer servants. I disagree with those motions. However, I will fight to my death the right of any messenger to make any motion they wish. That is the Baptist way.
Staying on the sidelines and sniping is not the Baptist way. The courageous thing to do would be to come to the convention, stand up in the business sessions and state your case, make your motions and trust the messengers to make the correct decisions. Even if your motion is defeated, you made your opinions known. Your idea at least got a hearing.
I hold no ill will toward the convention for the things they did or did not do with which I disagreed. I wish them no ill will because they did not do things the way I would have had them done. Those who do hold ill will toward the BGCT should either stand up or shut up. Either stand up in a convention session and speak your piece, or just be silent.
Lobbying to hurt the convention or hinder its work, by blog, or by word of mouth, to get others to feel the way you do is not a Christ-honoring way to do things. Attending, speaking up, and voting….that’s the Baptist way, and, I believe, the Christ-honoring way.




